|
Proposed Framework of Education
Statistics
Consultation Document
(June 2003)
Background
1. To meet the needs of society in the new millennium, the
Education Commission (EC) in September 2000 submitted a series
of recommendations to reform the education system with a view
to raising the overall quality of education in Hong Kong.
In his Policy Address delivered in October the same year,
the Chief Executive endorsed all the recommendations. The
implementation of the Education Reform commenced immediately
thereafter. Over the past two and a half years, a number of
reform measures were put in place progressively, including
inter alia, curriculum reform, the Primary One Admission and
Secondary School Places Allocation Systems reform, as well
as a number of measures to strengthen support for schools
and enhance teachers' and principals' professional competence.
2. The EC sees a need to formulate a framework of education
statistics to reflect the current state of education in Hong
Kong, and assess and evaluate the changes brought about by
the Education Reform. The EC considers that it is now opportune
to start developing such a framework taking into account the
experience of implementing the reform measures over the past
two years. The overriding purpose of the proposed framework
is to identify a small number of meaningful statistics that
can characterise quality education in Hong Kong and give a
reliable approximation of its development over time as reflected
through changes in the data or in Hong Kong's comparison with
other countries. It is hoped that a framework could be established
through consultation and consensus-building. The framework
is designed for the long term. Inevitably, new issues arise
that need to be addressed, and there will be a mechanism to
review the identified statistics to refine and update them.
The mechanism should be able to accommodate additional statistics
as the need arises and eliminate those no longer relevant.
While there will be a cycle of renewal, the basis will be
a regular set of statistics used over an extended period in
order to monitor changes and track trends.
3. The proposed framework will not set new targets or standards.
The information collected will serve as useful reference for
the interim reviews on various reform measures taken, and
possibly evidence supporting the continuation of the Education
Reform. It should be noted that the framework is not intended
for assessing individual schools' performance. Rather, the
framework should reflect the aggregate status of the relevant
attributes.
Basic Criteria for Statistics Selection
4. The key statistics should be -
(a) Reflective of the current state of education in Hong
Kong;
(b) Simple and easy to understand;
(c) Collectable and preferably readily available; and
(d) Agreeable to the public.
Overall speaking, the number of statistics to be included
in the framework should be kept to a minimum in order to retain
its communicative ability. Care should also be taken of the
potential signalling effect (and hence behavioral implications)
of some statistics.
The Proposed Initial Framework of Statistics
5. Having listened to the key stakeholders' views (including
some primary and secondary school heads, parent-teacher associations,
academics and the business sector) on the key elements constituting
quality education in Hong Kong, and made reference to the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
framework and the Education and Manpower Bureau's (EMB) framework
on Quality Assurance (QA), we have come up with a three-domain
framework with a total of 30 statistics. The framework on
QA and our proposed initial framework are at Tables
1 and 2 respectively.
6. The initial framework is modelled on the current QA framework
which comprises four domains, viz.
- management and organization;
- learning and teaching;
- support for students and school ethos; and
- student performance.
Information on these four domains may be further stratified
into four levels, namely student, school, territory and international
levels. Data on the first two levels are largely used at the
individual school level for self-evaluation. For
the proposed framework, only data on the territory and international
levels, including student performance, systemic data and aggregated
school data of the relevant attributes (highlighted in Table
2) will be included. The
management and organisation, learning and teaching, and support
for students and school ethos domains in the QA framework
are grouped under the aggregated school data category in our
proposed framework. Therefore, the proposed framework has
three domains, viz. student performance, aggregated school
data and systemic data.
7. Hong Kong has been participating in projects whereby students'
performance can be benchmarked to some international standards
such as the Programme for International Student Assessment
(PISA), Third International Mathematics and Science Study
(TIMSS) and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.
These statistics are presented at the international level.
8. While students' education in the moral, physical, intellectual,
social and aesthetic domains is an integral part of education
and whole-person development, and the community at large generally
agrees that to attain all-round development in these domains
is one of the aims of education in Hong Kong for the 21st
century, we have not included any statistics that measure
students' moral development or higher-order thinking ability
in the framework. The main reason for this is that information
on these aspects is difficult if not impossible to measure
and collect. For example, it is a trying task to measure a
student's creativity in an objective manner. If, for example,
the community considers students' creativity an indispensable
element constituting quality education in Hong Kong, then
we will need to identify or invent an instrument to measure
it. Obviously, it will take time before such an instrument
could be worked out and data collected. Therefore, at the
initial stage, we do not propose to include attributes that
are difficult to measure into the framework.
Data Collection
9. For the first publication of the education statistics
in 2004, it is proposed that only statistics that are readily
available and that either the EMB or the Census and Statistics
Department is already collecting on a regular basis should
be included. This will require no additional effort on the
part of students, teachers and schools. The proposed statistics
for the first batch of reporting scheduled in 2004 are in
Table 3.
Data Publication
10. The statistics will be published annually for public
consumption.
The Way Forward
11. It is vital that the EC develops a framework of statistics
reflecting the current state of education in Hong Kong with
a view to assessing and evaluating the progress of the Education
Reform. In view of the amount of change expected as a result
of implementing various Education Reform measures, it is particularly
important to have reliable ways of understanding the current
state of play and tracking progress over time. As the advisory
body on education matters, the EC will hammer out an initial
framework for discussion by the education sector and monitor
changes brought about by the Education Reform.
12. We welcome your views on the proposed initial statistics
framework. Please send them in writing by post, fax or e-mail
to the EC Secretariat on or before 31 October 2003 -
| Mailing address: |
Room 1101, 11/F.,
Wu Chung House,
213 Queen's Road East,
Wanchai, Hong Kong.
(Attn: Proposed Framework of Education Statistics) |
| E-mail address: |
educom@emb.gov.hk |
| Fax number: |
2537 4591 |
For enquiries, please call 2117 7464. This consultation document
is uploaded to the EC's website www.e-c.edu.hk.
|